Follow on TwitterLike on FacebookFollow on Google+Subscribe to RSS Feed

Health Care Reform: How Will State Insurance Exchanges Work?

Health Care Reform - How Will State Insurance Exchanges Work
Source: sxc.hu Photo: Leonardini

Earlier this week, the health care reform bill was passed. Rather than creating government controlled health insurance, the bill instead required everyone to purchase health insurance. Exceptions to this rule include those with financial hardship, Native Americans and those whose religious beliefs preclude it. Additionally, if you do not wish to purchase health insurance you can pay a penalty and avoid actually getting coverage.

Most currently insured people will probably still get their health insurance through their employers, and those who don’t have that access can purchase plans on state health insurance exchanges, due to be operating by 2014. Ignoring the semantic battle over whether or not these are true “exchanges”, since those seeking products and services can’t sell anything (only buy), let’s look at the basics of how these state health insurance exchanges would work:

Who Will be Able to Use Them? Are There Any Subsidies?

First of all, this is not an open market where anyone can just look for a competitive price on health insurance. Those who can go “shopping” are limited those who meet one or more of the following criteria:

  • Work at companies with less than 100 employees.
  • Work for a company that does not provide health insurance.
  • Self-employed.
  • Unemployed.
  • Retired, but not eligible for Medicare.
  • Small business.
  • After 2017, medium and large businesses.

If you can’t afford to purchase health insurance, under the health care reform bill you can see if you are eligible for subsidies from the government to help you pay the premiums on the insurance you purchase. A sliding scale, based on need, will be used to determine how much help you can get in terms of paying your premiums.

For those who want to buy their own insurance, for whatever reason, they can still do so even if they don’t meet the above criteria. They’ll just have to do it outside the exchange. And it is worth noting that the health care reform bill requires insurers that offer plans on exchanges to charge the same premiums on comparable plans outside the exchanges.

How Will They Operate? How Will They be Funded?

Originally, the thought was to have a national exchange. However, that plan was scuttled in favor of allowing states to manage their own exchanges (or have non-profit organizations manage for them). Federal money will be provided to help fund state exchange start-ups. States can also cooperate with each other in multi-state exchanges, creating larger pools of “customers” and offering more insurance options, since providers could compete directly with providers from other states.

However, there are rules to being listed on the exchanges. Overseers are expected to make sure that the insurers listed on their exchanges follow certain rules. Plans must be “in the interest” of buyers, say the authors of the bill. State health insurance regulators must have rubrics for determining which insurers certify to offer their products on the exchange. Additionally, there has to be a standard format for presenting the options and costs in a way that buyers allows buyers to efficiently compare their options. Presumably, this means that states will bar insurance companies that do not meet “quality standards” from selling on the exchanges.

States cannot set premiums, though. Insurance companies can set their own premiums and they can decide which plans of declining coverage (in declining levels of expense and offers encompassing “platinum,” “gold,” “silver,” and “bronze”) they will offer. However, states are authorized to demand that insurers justify rate increases and prices. If states are dissatisfied with the reasoning behind the changes, the plan offered can be taken off the exchange. Insurers will have to be more transparent about their pricing, and how they spend their revenues, especially if they want to be included on the exchanges.

The authors of this legislation hope that the health care reform bill, with state health exchanges as a key part of the transition to a new system buying health insurance, will create more competition among health insurers and plans (lowering health insurance prices), while providing more people with access to affordable health care. Do you think that this state exchange program will accomplish those goals?

6 Responses to Health Care Reform: How Will State Insurance Exchanges Work?

  1. I do not think the state exchange program will accomplish their goals. I think there will be added administration for the insurance firms. I currently use a national plan because I travel and am self employed. I pay a little more for this but I also like to have the option of being able to travel to a specialty hospital out of state if there is a serious illness. I am afraid the national plans may not exist with the state exchange programs.

  2. Don’t we already have a healthy “exchange” in the free market system currently used? I can google “health insurance in CA” or go to ehealth.com or one of a 100 other sites and get prices from all insurance companies in the state. Or I could get really crazy and call a broker and discuss my options with him/her. I don’t see how having a state run “exchange” will change the system in any way. Insurance companies will still create their own products and sell them at prices that they think the market will bear.

  3. I really don’t know how they can mandate that people have health insurance. If someone has no money, they just have no money. What are you going to do?

  4. Only time will tell if the goals are met. Unfortunately, if one doesn’t have health insurance, it can lead to costly fines with the new bill…our best advice is to speak to a health insurance agent who can provide you the best advice and rates based on your situation.

  5. While the health bill addresses the coverage issue, a huge driver of the rising costs are the providers. There currently is not really much other than suggestions and the creation of committees to look at comparative effectiveness research, which will limit the cost of health care. It does not matter if the insurance market is competative, if the overall costs are rising across the board. An example is that the price of a yacht is expensive but across all yacht makers they are competative, but the average person still cannot afford one. The current provider system is essentially a fee-for-service system with the physicians getting reimbursed based on the services they ring a person up for. This creates an opportunity for them to treat medicine as a money making machine (google and article on McAllen Texas). Providers need to be taken to task as much as the insurance companies.

    This bill will help Americans without health coverage get that coverage, but as for controlling the rising costs of healthcare as a whole (which in turn drives the costs of health insurance), there is little to nothing handling this issue.

Leave a reply